What part of indisputable did you not understand?

Jay Carney says it’s “preposterous” to doubt that there were chemical weapons attacks in Syria or that the government was responsible. Biden says there’s “no doubt,” and last week Kerry said it was “indisputable.” So that settles that: evidently the debate on the facts is over without ever having actually, you know, occurred. We seem to have skipped right past that to the part where officials deny the validity of questioning “facts” which are, after all, indisputable, beyond dispute so why are you even still trying to dispute them, you preposterous lackwits?

Shouldn’t Kerry at least go to the UN with a test tube of fake anthrax or something? Isn’t that, like, traditional?

Don't see comments? Click on the post title to view or post comments.